These descriptions inform Claude when generating campaign briefs.
Claude uses these to classify inspiration videos and generate briefs.
Opens with a question the viewer needs answerer. The key mechanic is specificity — the more precise the gap, the more irresistible it feels. Vague curiosity ("something interesting happened") doesn't stop thumbs; specific curiosity ("what happened after week 3") does. The gap must be closeable within the video or you lose trust.
Asserts something surprising, counter-intuitive, or that challenges a widely held belief. Works because it creates mild cognitive dissonance — the viewer stays to see if you can back it up. Specificity is critical here too: the more concrete the claim, the more credible it feels before you've proven anything.
Disrupts the autopilot scroll before any content is delivered. It's a purely mechanical hook — it works regardless of niche because it operates at the level of attention, not interest. The goal is to make the brain pause and ask "wait, what?" Most effective when combined with a verbal hook in the first 1–2 seconds.
Calls out a specific person by identity, situation, or problem. The narrower the call-out, the stronger the effect — counterintuitively, "if you're a freelance copywriter who charges by the word" outperforms "if you're a freelancer" because the right person feels like you're speaking only to them. Everyone else scrolls, which is fine — they weren't your viewer anyway.
Names a frustration, feeling, or situation the viewer is already experiencing. The hook works by making the viewer feel seen — which creates an immediate emotional connection before you've offered anything. The best versions voice the viewer's exact inner monologue, not a sanitized description of the problem. Don't solve it in the hook; just surface it.
Frames the hook around scale, authority, or what's at risk. Works by activating two of Cialdini's core influence principles simultaneously — social proof ("others validated this") and authority ("credible sources weigh in"). Numbers are load-bearing in this hook type; remove them and the hook usually collapses. Best used when you're debunking, correcting, or contextualizing something widely believed.
Sets up one expectation, then deliberately subverts it. The viewer thinks they're getting X, and instead gets Y — where Y is the actual point. The switch should feel surprising but not dishonest; the viewer should feel cleverly redirected, not misled